Performance
- Views (24h)
- 304,000
- Views / Hour
- 12,667
- Total Views
- 621,826
- Duration
- 47:15
Regions
Topics
Description
This video is a response to @JeffNippard, my former client. In chapter 2, I’ll outline the story where Mike Israetel of@RenaissancePeriodizationfirst alleged that I reviewed a mistakenly uploaded draft copy of his doctoral thesis, but subsequently admitted that I’d reviewed the correct text. I’ll then pivot to Jeff Nippard in chapter 3, where I’ll provide some important framing by going over my history with this so-called scientist, and how he came to be my two-time consulting client. In chapter 4, I’ll provide an overview of Jeff’s recent attacks on me, and his interesting request. In chapter 5, I’ll critically analyse said attacks and his interesting request. In chapter 6, I conclude by discussing broader implications. Special thanks to the brilliant@RenVasTerulfor granting me permission to use his excellent rendition of the Sardaukar Chant, linked here: https://youtu.be/uIgR_pW3wAU?si=v2YebpQQK2a0J5v- Chapters: 0:00 Prologue 0:28 Chapter 1. Introduction 2:30 - Chapter 2. The Mike Israetel debacle 5:10 Chapter 3. An overview of my history with Jeff Nippard, my former client 5:42 3.1. My critique of Jeff Nippard’s impossible ‘bench press specialization’ program 11:26 3.2. Jeff’s first comment 13:15 3.3. My critique of Jeff’s ‘women’s specialization’ program 15:53 3.4. Jeff’s second comment and subsequent consulting offer 17:53 3.5. My consulting gig 18:18 3.5.1. The first engagement 19:08 3.5.2. The second engagement 19:47 3.6. The disappearing comment 22:43 Chapter 4. An...